Skip to main content
Compute Atlas
← Back to the map

Mount Pleasant, WI · Racine County · 42.721°N 87.902°W

Microsoft Mount Pleasant Data Center Campus

Microsoft

Under constructionAI-specificReported

Key facts

Location
Mount Pleasant, WI, Racine County
Capacity
1,000 MW planned
Powered by
grid (We Energies) + planned renewables
Announced
2025-01
Last updated

Civic impact

Economics

Investment
$3.3B
Land
1,575 acres
Jobs
2,300 construction · 550 permanent

Energy & water

Energy source
Mixed · Utility: We Energies
Cooling
Hybrid
Water use
0.702 MGD

Microsoft pledges to match every fossil-fuel kilowatt-hour one-for-one with carbon-free energy; a 250 MW solar project in Portage County is under construction to support the commitment. No on-site generation reported.

Primarily dry cooling with evaporative backup only above ~85°F, running waterless for 90%+ of the year. 0.702 MGD is the regulatory-filing peak for the full campus (Phase 1 peak ~0.234 MGD); water is sourced from the city of Racine (Lake Michigan).

Public subsidies

Community sentiment

Mixed

Village and county leadership are supportive; Midwest Environmental Advocates sued the city of Racine over withheld water-usage records, and Marquette Law School polling found ~70% of Wisconsinites believe data-center costs outweigh benefits. The Microsoft deal itself carries no new public borrowing, against a Foxconn-era backdrop of local debt.

Microsoft says it hired around 375 people for its Mount Pleasant data center

Status history

  1. Proposed

    Site reported as part of Microsoft's $80B global AI data center investment plan

    Microsoft will invest $80B to build out AI infrastructure — Microsoft On the Issues
  2. Under construction

    Construction active; Racine County site confirmed

    Microsoft data center coming to Racine County, Wisconsin — Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Location

Sources & data provenance

Reported: data based on credible news outlets or industry sources.

Last updated:

Compute Atlas is community-correctable. If you have better data, please open an issue.

Suggest a correction →